Editor-Curated Robotics Industry Briefing - RobotToday

China's Supreme Court Rules Patent Lawsuits Against Unitree Robotics as Malicious

China's Supreme People’s Court has determined that two patent lawsuits against Unitree Robotics regarding its Go2 and A2 robot dogs were malicious. The lawsuits were based on a patent titled 'An Electronic Dog,' which the court found to be invalid, rejecting the infringement claims made by the plaintiff, Luweimei Company. Notably, Luweimei obtained the patent just five days before initiating the first lawsuit. The significance of this ruling lies in the court's dismissal of the plaintiff's claims, which initially sought RMB500 in compensation but escalated to RMB80 million during the appeal, only to revert back to RMB500. The patent authority in China invalidated the patent on March 12, reinforcing the court's decision. Additionally, Unitree's counterclaim in the A2 case was upheld, resulting in Luweimei being ordered to pay RMB80,000 in legal costs and RMB3,700 in court fees. Looking ahead, this ruling could have implications for future patent litigation in the robotics sector, particularly regarding the validity of patents and the potential for malicious lawsuits. No further timeline was disclosed at the time of publication.